Chris Lang

Why it works: The demise of the Night King

September 1, 2020 in Blogs, Chris Lang's Commentaries

Re-presenting a post from early May, 2019.

Hello and welcome to Why It Works, where I explain why a certain plot point in fiction that’s been argued about actually works within the context of the fictional work.

This time, for the first time, I’ll be writing about Game of Thrones.

From the very start of the series, Game of Thrones has revolved around two major conflicts.

The first conflict, of course, is the titular ‘Game of Thrones’: The struggle for the Iron Throne, and rulership of the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros. In Season One, King Robert Baratheon dies, and a dispute ensues over whether the cruel prince Joffrey Baratheon is actually the rightful heir to the throne, as it’s soon revealed he is not actually Robert’s son. This sparks the War of the Five Kings. Eventually, all five of those kings die, but there are other candidates for the Iron Throne out there. This includes Cersei Lannister (the widow of Robert Baratheon and mother of Joffrey and Tommen), the exiled Daenerys Targaryen of the overthrown Targaryen house (who has returned to Westeros to claim the throne she believes is hers), and Jon Snow (who has only recently learned that his true father is a Targaryen and therefore has a possibly legit claim to the throne).

The second conflict, however, is the one looming on the horizon since the very first episode. A conflict with far greater stakes than power or thrones. And it is this conflict, and the ultimate resolution, that we’ll be discussing in this blog post. Read the rest of this entry →

Toons These Days: What’s it about?

April 18, 2018 in Blogs, Chris Lang's Commentaries

Toons These Days: What’s it about?
April 18, 2018/3 Comments/in Basic: Animation, BLOGS, Chris Langs Commentaries /by Chris Lang

In an attempt to take my mind off the recent Channel Awesome debacle and in fact get something good out of it, I decided to check out one of the shows it until recently carried that I haven’t seen yet.

With a title like ‘Toons These Days’, how could I resist?

‘Toons These Days’ is the creation of Alex Dudley of DToons. It’s a spinoff of his animated shorts ‘Conroy Cat and Friends’, featuring Doggy D. Dachschund, a grumpy old toon from the 1920s, ranting about recent cartoons. It’s all basically played for laughs.

The original season mostly featured Doggy at various locations ranting about toons in grumpy old man style. According to the creator, Doggy’s rants weren’t meant to be taken entirely seriously given how exaggerated they are, and don’t necessarily reflect the creator’s opinions. However, some members of the audience actually agreed with him, and others didn’t like how he was complaining about their favorite cartoons. And others of course just laughed.

Later in the first season, and throughout the second, Conroy Cat would show up to provide some more analytical and balanced commentary on the cartoons, and the show became more of a review show. Doggy would rant, and often be brutal (though he seemed to mellow out a bit in the later episodes), and Conroy Cat would be a bit calmer and in the end rate the cartoons through one to five anvils.

It’s all well and good, though some of the early episodes of Season Two have a jarring sound inconsistency. They begin with Doggy and his ramblings, and then switch over to Conroy Cat’s portion – which is a lot louder than Doggy’s.

Doggy and Conroy also figure prominently in other shorts where they demonstrate cartoon physics, and the occasional ‘Ask a Toon’ feature. These bits feature fun examples of classic cartoon slapstick.

All in all, if you want short, funny commentary on cartoons, then ‘Toons These Days’, ‘Conroy Cat and Friends’, and Dtoons is well worth checking out. Look for it on Youtube or the Dtoons web site.

I give it … four and a half anvils.

Tags: cartoons, Conroy Cat, Doggy D. Dachshund, Dtoons, Toons These Days

When originally posted, this blog had the following replies:

t-kun-unusual-wordsmith-iii
t-kun-unusual-wordsmith-iii says:
April 18, 2018 at 4:19 am

Sounds like it could been something really good, sad to hear that it didn’t last long. Well handled here overall, good work.
Log in to Reply
nitwit
nitwit says:
April 18, 2018 at 2:10 am

I’ve seen Toon These Days on YouTube. I just assume he stop making them because of the different market on YouTube? Money! lol
Log in to Reply
chris-lang
chris-lang says:
April 18, 2018 at 2:16 am

It seems more recently he’s focusing on largely fan crossover speculation, and less stuff with his original creations like Conroy and Doggy. I haven’t checked those out yet.
Log in to Reply

Channel Awesome’s sad last days

April 12, 2018 in Blogs, Chris Lang's Commentaries

Channel Awesome’s sad last days
April 12, 2018/15 Comments/in Basic: Nostalgia, Basic: Thoughts, BLOGS, Chris Langs Commentaries /by Chris Lang

Tabloid headlines: The original clickbait.

Were popular (or once-popular) Internet sites covered by supermarket tabloids, it would be easy to imagine the title of this article making the covers of a few of them.

As many of you reading this are no doubt aware, Channel Awesome has suffered a serious decline in recent years. In its glory days (which would be roughly 2008 to 2012), Channel Awesome hosted not only the Nostalgia Critic, but a whole bunch of pop culture review shows, including Lindsay Ellis (formerly the Nostalgia Chick), Atop the Fourth Wall, the Spoony Experiment, The Angry Joe Show, Bennett the Sage, the Cinema Snob, MarzGurl, Phelous, Obscurus Lupa, Film Brain, Todd in the Shadows, Guru Larry, MasakoX, Oancitizen and a whole bunch of others. Later additions would include That SciFiGuy, Chris Stuckman, SFDebris, Leon Thomas’ Renegade Cut, Tony Goldmark, and more.

But even in its glory days, there were plenty of instances of mismanagement, communication failures, and questionable handling of incidents. These flaws managed to remain under control up until the time of To Boldly Flee, but afterwards were causing serious damage to the brand. There seemed to be a gradual lack of confidence and trust in the non-Chicago producers. As the years went by, many high-profile producers left, some for their own reasons and some because of disputes or disagreement with site management. Lupa and Phelous, in particular, left due to a serious falling out between them and Channel Awesome CEO Mike Michaud. Read the rest of this entry →

My favorite Christmas comics from Marvel and DC

December 2, 2017 in Blogs, Chris Lang's Commentaries

My favorite Christmas comics from Marvel and DC
December 24, 2017/5 Comments/in Basic: Comic Books, BLOGS, Chris Langs Commentaries /by Chris Lang

Christmas, like no other holiday, has inspired a lot of things. Stories, songs, TV specials, movies, you name it. It’s gotten to the point where all these things are (to many) an indispensable part of the holiday season.

Christmas has inspired a number of comic book specials as well. Manic Expression’s own richb wrote his own list of top 12 Christmas comics a few years back. I thought I’d do so as well. There will be at least two overlapping items, but there will be a lot of comics that didn’t make richb’s list. Especially since I’ll be including one or two Marvel items as well. Read the rest of this entry →

WIJDW: Superman turning the world backwards

June 26, 2017 in Blogs, Chris Lang's Commentaries

WIJDW: Superman turning the world backwards
June 26, 2017/3 Comments/in Basic: Movies & TV, BLOGS, Chris Langs Commentaries /by Chris Lang

Hello and welcome to Why It Just Doesn’t Work (or WIJDW), where I take a look at moments within movies, television, comic books, or other media and explain why they just don’t work.

Okay, I’m running the risk of beating a dead horse here. As you’ve probably guessed from the title, this article is about the controversial conclusion of the 1978 classic Superman: The Movie, starring Christopher Reeve as Superman. And I know what you’re thinking: Hasn’t this already been talked about enough? Maybe, but there are a few points about it that I don’t think people have talked about enough. Mainly the fact that they get so carried away discussing the visual representation of the event that they don’t discuss the meaning of it. Read the rest of this entry →

A Look at Not Disney: A Snow White Christmas

April 1, 2016 in Blogs, Chris Lang's Commentaries

A Look at Not Disney: A Snow White Christmas
April 1, 2016/5 Comments/in A Look At Disney, Basic: Animation, Basic: Movies & TV, Basic: Nostalgia, BLOGS, Chris Langs Commentaries /by Chris Lang

So, did you know that there was a sequel to Snow White and the Seven Dwarves set during Christmas? Indeed there is, though you might not have seen it or even heard of it until now.

At this point, you probably are thinking it’s one of Disney’s direct-to-DVD sequels they did in the 90’s. When they ran out of sequels to their 90s hits, they went back further and did sequels, prequels, and midquels to Cinderella, The Jungle Book, The Fox and the Hound, and 101 Dalmations, among other things. So it wouldn’t be surprising if they did a direct-to-video Snow White sequel, too.

Except, A Snow White Chrismas isn’t a Disney direct-to-DVD sequel. In fact, it was originally released in 1979, long before anyone knew what a DVD was. And Disney had nothing to do with it: it was made by Filmation. Read the rest of this entry →

WIJDW: An explanation

November 14, 2014 in Uncategorized

Okay, so I’ve made a series of blogs titled WIJDW, which is short for Why It Just Doesn’t Work. I think I should explain further just why I write these columns.

To start, I’d like to explain the concept of ‘suspension of disbelief’. The term was coined by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1817. Willing suspension of disbelief means at least temporarily accepting a few elements in fiction that are, at least, very unlikely in real life.

However, this does NOT mean that an audience should just shut their brains off and accept everything they see. A story still has to be grounded in reality and human nature. Even a fantasy story has to have limits and obey its own internal logic, or else it will degenerate into nonsense. If one goes too far with their fantastic or ridiculous elements, an audience is likely to go “Oh, come on now!”.

Read the rest of this entry →

Titanic Turkeys: Top 12 Dumbest Animated Titanic Moments

November 13, 2014 in Uncategorized

So last year, I did reviews of both animated Titanic movies, Titanic: The Legend Goes On, and The Legend of the Titanic.  I more or less covered what I felt were the main problems with both movies in those reviews, as I analyzed them both as films on their own merits and as films about the Titanic.

However, there’s a lot of points that, in order to keep the reviews from being too long, I had to leave out or just make brief mention of. At least some of these points, I felt, needed to be elaborated on further. So here’s my Top 12 Dumbest Animated Titanic Moments.

(Oh, and you can read my Titanic Turkeys: Titanic the Legend Goes On review here, and my Titanic Turkeys: The Legend of the Titanic review here).

12: The huge cast of characters in Titanic: The Legend Goes On.

Titanic: The Legend Goes On has a HUGE cast of characters. Not only do we have the romantic leads of Angelica and William, and their families, but we’ve got Corynthia Meanstreak (however you spell it) the jewel thief/Cruella de Ville knockoff and her Jasper and Horace knockoff henchmen, Sam Bradbury the detective who’s supposed to be pursuing those jewel thieves (but doesn’t really get anything done about them until the epilogue), Molly the singer and her dalmations, the mustached man named Gaston who’s attracted to Molly, the American Tail knockoff immigrant mice, the cat and chihuahua duo who menace them, the Mexican mice, Fritz the dog (and his rapping alter-ego), and a whole bunch of other human and animal characters who are rather forgettable. Some of these characters seem to be in the movie solely because the makers wanted to squeeze in as many knockoffs of other animated characters as possible (in much the manner of the Seltzer-Friedberg so-called parody movies).

As a result, the makers of the film clearly wind up with more characters than they know what to do with. Many of these characters aren’t given enough time to develop and become memorable on their own merits as characters. Some have very little personality to speak of. There are subplots competing for time, and most of them don’t go anywhere.

11.  Rachel’s sister in The Legend of the Titanic

Speaking of characters the makers hadn’t a clue what to do with, we have the even more pointless Rachel’s sister from the other animated Titanic movie. Rachel is, of course, Elizabeth’s evil stepmother who wishes Elizabeth to be married to the obviously evil whaling tycoon Everard Maltravers, and later conspires with Maltravers in his insane plan (more on that later).

But along with Rachel comes her sister, who contributes absolutely nothing. She is nothing more than a clone of Rachel, and only speaks twice in the film. Even then, it’s mostly in unison with Rachel.  Why is she there? What reason is there for her to exist? Was she part of some subplot that was cut for time? If so, that would explain a lot — including the presence of her and Rachel’s cats who ALSO don’t do anything (despite the mice briefly mentioning that rich people’s pets are mean so stay away from them).

At least the chihuahua and cat duo in Titanic: The Legend Goes On got to be antagonists in the animals’ subplot. But here, the only antagonists needed are Maltravers, Rachel, and the butler Jeffries. And the gang of sharks (more on them later). Even then, it’s debatable whether or not a Titanic film really needs villains when the iceberg is enough of an antagonist already. But if you’re going to include villains, at LEAST have them do something. Rachel’s sister (as opposed to everyone else mentioned in this paragraph) doesn’t do anything.

10.  The repetitive dialogue in Titanic: The Legend Goes On

In addition to questionable animation quality, Titanic: The Legend Goes On also has a lot of redundant and repetitive dialogue. The phrase “We’re on a boat in the middle of the ocean” gets repeated several times, for example. This is especially glaring in the longer version. The worst would be when, during the sinking, a crewman bars the passengers from rushing the lifeboats saying “You can’t go through here. Don’t make me resort to violence.” over and over again — in the same voice clip. It’s as if he’s a malfunctioning Audio Animatronic or something. Seriously, it’s another sign that the makers of the film just didn’t care, and were only trying to cash in on the then-current Titanic craze.

9.  Maltravers’ overly complex plan

So let me get this straight: Maltravers’ plan is to first marry the Duke of Camden’s daughter Elizabeth so he can get whaling rights to areas of the sea that are under the Duke’s protection. When that fails, he and Rachel decide to force the Duke at gunpoint to sign over the whaling rights (as well as a last will and testament leaving his wealth to Rachel), and then sink the ship with the Duke on it. Apparently, that last part must have been planned a long time in advance, seeing as clearly Maltravers made the alliance with the evil gang of sharks some time prior to the events of the movie. But why go to all this trouble? Weren’t there simpler ways of getting the Duke out of the way (and covering his tracks) that didn’t involve also killing hundreds of people who had nothing to do with the whole whaling deal?

Why? It’s because Maltravers is evil, of course. And speaking of characters who are obviously evil, that brings us to…

8. The evil gang of sharks

Really, an evil gang of sharks. Who have striped hats and prison numbers.

How did the Titanic historians miss THIS detail?
How did the Titanic historians miss THIS detail?

And whose leader is Mr. Ice (aka Icy Incisors), who says he and the boys are ready to destroy anything, any time. It’s at this point that we KNOW the film’s going to be really bad. Forget for a moment that this is a film about the Titanic, this whole thing doesn’t make sense. When did Maltravers form an alliance with a gang of sharks? When did his butler gain the ability to speak to them? WHY DO THESE SHARKS HAVE PRISON HATS AND PRISON NUMBERS? Aaaagh! The Plot Hole is getting bigger as I say this!

Oh, and speaking of plot holes, the opening prologue has the much older Top Connors (who narrates the story to his grandkids) claim he has the whistle Jeffries used to summon Mr. Ice. But it’s never explained when Top Connors got the whistle, nor even how he knew it was used to summon Mr. Ice. Unless, of course, the older Top Connors is making the whole story up. Which might also explain the next item on this list…

7. The “death” of Camembert

Ah, Camembert. This older sailor mouse colleague of Top Connors is introduced fairly early on in the film, but then mostly disappears until he’s needed again in the disaster. Top Connors finds him during the sinking because they need his help to fix the telegraph wires (otherwise the Titanic won’t be able to send the distress call). So they try to put the ends of the wire back together, only to find the wires won’t connect.

But Camembert knows what to do. He tells the other mice to tie the ends of the wires to his mustache, so the telegraph signal will pass through his mustache to the rest of the wire. He does this, and his nose flashes as the signal goes through. It looks like this is being played for cartoonish sight gags … but then Camembert is not moving anymore. The mice are saddened, and Top Connors tearfully calls Camembert a hero.

And then at the end of the movie, Camembert shows up alive and well, with no explanation. He was apparently electrocuted, his body was left behind to sink with the ship (meaning that even if the electricity only stunned him, drowning or hypothermia should have finished him off), and somehow survives all that and is brought to New York by the dolphins and the whales? There’s no explanation for it whatsoever, aside from the makers of the film (or the older Top Connors if you go by the Unreliable Narrator theory) softening things for the sake of the kiddies. If only this were the worst example of that in this movie, but alas it’s not.

Camembert the indestructableable

6. The overly cheerful Where Are They Now Epilogue in The Legend Goes On

While we’re on the subject of softening things for the sake of the kiddies, we shouldn’t let the other film get a free pass. Maxie the young immigrant mouse (the one who got saved from being ‘in someone else’s digestion’ early on in the film) breaks the fourth wall at the end of the movie and says “Where are you going? The movie isn’t over yet. Don’t you want to know what happened to everyone?” The fourth-wall breaking part isn’t the dumb part — compared to the other dumb things in that movie alone, it only deserves an honorable (?) mention on this list.

No, the dumb part is the cheerful tone the mouse gives as he describes what the various characters did after the disaster. He describes how Sam Bradbury was rewarded for nabbing Corynthia Meanstreak (even though Bradbury seemed like a hopeless incompetent in most of his scenes), how the mouse and his family were granted a new home in a New York restaurant by the chef whose life they saved, how the stepsisters married Corynthia’s henchmen Kirk and Dirk (who think they’ve got it made, and it gives them something to do with their boss in jail) and how William and Angelica adopted the dalamations and were married. He concludes with “Here’s hoping they live happily ever after. See you soon!”

He barely even mentions the disaster at all, aside from mentioning that the dalmations lost their original owner in it. Aside from that, the sinking of the Titanic and the 1500 or more lives that were lost is just swept under the rug. All in the name of making a Lighter and Softer Titanic movie that the kids could see. It’s insulting to kids, to adults, and to those on board the Titanic. But that’s NOTHING compared to how The Legend of the Titanic handles the disaster.

But we’ll get to that later.

Fanfic Subgenres: The Fix Fic

November 12, 2014 in Uncategorized

Welcome to the second of my series of articles I call ‘Fanfic Subgenres’. Here, I discuss certain subgenres of fanfiction, and how certain professionally-produced media can sometimes fall into the same categories.

While my first installment dealt with crossover and ‘fusion’ fics, this one will discuss the ‘fix fic’. What is a fix fic, you may ask?

A ‘fix fic’ is when a fanfiction author takes a certain part of a series (be it a TV series, comic books, a series of movies, or other stuff) that didn’t sit well with them, and then proceeds to rewrite or undo it. In some examples, they go to incredible lengths to retcon, undo, and/or explain away certain parts they did not like. Read the rest of this entry →

Fanfic Subgenres: Real Person Fics

November 12, 2014 in Uncategorized

Fanfic Subgenres: Real Person Fics
Posted by Chris Lang on April 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM

Hello and welcome to Fanfic Subgenres, where I take a look at subgenres of fan fiction, and then find examples of those same subgenres in professionally-produced works.

One of the most despised genres of fan fiction is the Real Person Fic. It’s pretty much Exactly What It Says On The Tin. It’s a fictional work involving a real person.

Most of the real people involved in Real Person Fics are celebrities of some sort, be they actors, singers, politicians, or whatever. Some fanfic writer decides to write fics about them, regardless of their being real people and regardless of what the real person, their families, or their lawyers might think about it.

So we have seen tons of real-person fics. Some might be just harmless fluff about a fangirl meeting her favorite singer or something, but some take their obsessions with celebrities in strange, weird, and sometimes disturbing directions.

Read the rest of this entry →

Top Six WTH Moments in Bad Fanfic

November 12, 2014 in Uncategorized

If you’ve read a large amount of fan fiction, or are a regular viewer of the Fanfic Critic, then you know there’s a LOT of bad fanfics out there. There are fanfics that write characters horribly out of character, fanfics that are nothing but self-indulgent tripe, fanfics that have horrible spelling and grammar, and fanfics that leave one wondering just what the hell the author was thinking when he/she wrote it.

However, there are also individual moments within the aforementioned types of fanfics that also make one go ‘What the Hell?’. Even in context, they’re crazy, and insane, and come out of nowhere. And what’s more, many of them, as crazy as they are, are NOT Big Lipped Alligator Moments because they actually have importance to the plot.

So, borrowing a concept from Linkara’s ‘Top 15 WTF Moments In Bad Comics’, I now present my Top Six WTH Moments In Bad Fanfic. Why Top Six? Because we all owe the Nostalgia Critic a great debt for liberating us from the tyranny of Top 10s, Top 5s, and other countdowns in increments of five.

Read the rest of this entry →

Villain Songs That Aren’t From Musicals: A Top Six

November 10, 2014 in Uncategorized

Admit it. For many of us, Villain Songs are a guilty pleasure.

Villain Songs are, of course, songs sung by the villain of a musical, be it a stage musical, an animated feature, or whatever. There the villain sings about their goals, their feelings about themselves, their feelings about the people whose lives they’re about to ruin (via scamming them, stealing from them, or worse), and/or about their motives. Villain songs can be funny, over-the-top, dramatic, or even frightening. Whatever the mood of the song is, Villain Songs usually tend to be among the most memorable songs of a musical.

Of course, not all Villain Songs actually come from musicals. There are some songs that certainly qualify as Villain Songs, but which aren’t from works that we can truly call a musical.  This can be because either

A. The work in question has only one song, and the Villain Song happens to be it.

B. The song isn’t from a work. It’s a song inspired by a villain or villains sung from the point of view of a villain.  You’re likely to find this song at live concerts or CDs by singers who sing songs themed around fantasy, sci-fi, fairy tales, horror, and myths and legends.

So without further ado, here’s my Top Six Villain Songs That Aren’t From Musicals. Why Top Six? Because like the Nostalgia Critic, I like to go one step beyond (at the very least).

Read the rest of this entry →