Curiosity Inc.

Movie Curiosities: The Wrong Girls

Movie Curiosities: The Wrong Girls

August 17, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Ooh, a stoner comedy. Haven’t seen one of those in a while. I wonder who decided… Point Grey. Seth Rogen produced this. That explains a lot.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: The End of Oak Street

Movie Curiosities: The End of Oak Street

August 16, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

I’ve long had mixed feelings about J.J. Abrams. Granted, a lot of my reservations about him can be traced back to recurring collaborator Damon Lindelof (that overrated hack) and his increasingly bad deal with Paramount. But now the Mission: Impossible series is finally over for the foreseeable future and Bad Robot has finally split from them to set up shop at Warner Bros.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Super Troopers 3

Movie Curiosities: Super Troopers 3

August 11, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Here we have the latest entry in a long-dormant franchise that I had no prior knowledge of. It’s not terribly often that I feel compelled to see such a movie, and even less frequent when I feel compelled to go back and watch the previous entries. But Super Troopers 3 caught my attention.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities — Spider-Man: Brand New Day

Movie Curiosities — Spider-Man: Brand New Day

August 4, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

For the past several months, we’ve known the leading cast list for the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday. Naturally, it’s a plethora of established Marvel mainstays alongside relative newcomers and old favorites dating all the way back to the Bryan Singer era. But one name was conspicuously absent: Tom Holland. How could we possibly have an Avengers film without Spider-Man?

Answer: Because Spider-Man was getting his own massive crossover picture with seismic implications for the future of Marvel on film. Yes, we’re getting two of them within six months.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: I Want Your Sex

Movie Curiosities: I Want Your Sex

August 2, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

We’ve got to be more careful about how we title our movies, people. If we have to go to the box office and tell a total stranger “I Want Your Sex, please,” don’t act surprised when the ticket sales take a hit!

I Want Your Sex is the second Olivia Wilde sex comedy currently in theaters. And they’re both totally different, to the benefit of both movies. One was an examination of ethical non-monogamy, directed by Wilde herself. The other is produced/co-written/directed by the notorious shock filmmaker Greg Araki, in which Wilde plays an outrageously unethical boss who engages her employee (played by Cooper Hoffman) in an ongoing sexual BDSM affair. One was built to be an intimate character drama with grounded and three-dimensional characters, while the other is absurdly heightened.

So, the premise is funnier, the cast doesn’t have Seth Rogen dragging it down, and we actually get onscreen sex and nudity in the bargain. So far, so much better.

Wilde plays Erika Tracy, a notorious and eccentric provocateur in modern art, with a particular reputation for sexually charged works of abstract multimedia. And somehow, she’s successful and wealthy enough to afford her own studio, complete with a platoon of underpaid interns (led by Vikktor, her majordomo, played by Daveed Diggs) at her beck and call.

Our protagonist is Elliot (Hoffman), a recent UCLA grad with a girlfriend (Minerva, played by Charlie XCX, of all people) who plainly hates his guts. To wit: Instead of living together, Elliot shares an apartment with his longtime best friend (Apple, played by Chase Sui Wonders). After however much time unable to pay his share of the rent, Elliot lands a job (a little too easily, I might add) as one of Erika’s interns.

That’s where the plot begins, but it’s not where the film begins. The film literally opens with Erika naked and unconscious, face-down in her pool, while Elliott’s face is smeared with blood and lipstick and he’s wearing nothing but lacy pink lingerie. The movie — told in flashback — is about how the almighty fuck we get to that point.

See, Elliot is of the generation that grew up hyperaware of “cancel culture”, in which most personal interaction happens online. So the poor naive idiot is clueless in matters of intimacy and how to form a stable, healthy relationship. This in turn means that as soon as any halfway-attractive woman gives him any kind of attention, his backbone completely evaporates.

In summary, he’s the perfect mark for someone like Erika, a straight-up narcissist who runs through the predatory relationship playbook to a T. She leverages her power as his employer. She steadily destroys everything else in Elliot’s life. She isolates him by destroying every other relationship and friendship he has. She leads him along with an expert balance of insults and compliments. She has no regard for personal boundaries, going so far as to domme without a safe word. (!!!)

At some point, it’s hard to tell if Erika has any kind of endgame. Is this for her art? Is Erika venting her personal stress? As the film unfolds, we come to learn that it’s all of that and none of it. The bottom line is that Erika isn’t just a sadist and a sociopath, she’s an outright hedonist. She’s pathologically incapable of thinking beyond whatever she wants in the moment. And it doesn’t matter if she’s a liar and an idiot and she’s only out for herself — she genuinely believes that everyone else is too.

And Elliot? Mostly, he’s grateful to make any kind of sexual connection. Especially if he’s stuck in a “sub” position, which obviates any kind of guesswork or effort on his part. And again, Elliot is a spineless naive twerp whom Erika is perfectly capable of manipulating.

Getting back to the comparison with The Invite, that movie was more interested in the emotional/mental aspect of sex. This one is all about the physical. This is all about the carnal and chemical urge for any kind of sexual release in defiance of all common sense and self-preservation. Though I might add that the film also has a lot to say about the nature and purpose of art, how true or “real” art is, the interplay between art and commerce, the interplay between artist and audience, and so on and so forth.

Here’s the problem: It’s all buried under so much noise.

The film is only 90 minutes long, and most of that is taken up by the various sexual misadventures of Elliot and Erika. This movie is heightened to such an outrageous degree, we’ve got Mason Gooding on deck as the token BIPOC gay friend. The police detectives are played by goddamn Margaret Cho and Johnny Fucking Knoxville!

There’s so much going on here that it’s too easy for details to get lost in the scrum. For instance, Apple is introduced in such a way as to make it clear that she’s gay, until later scenes throw that into question and we never get a clear answer regarding her sexuality. Which is kind of a crucial point in a movie that’s all about sexual discovery.

Getting back to the various themes at play, there’s a major problem: They’re primarily explored by way of Erika. The film is trying to examine bodily autonomy, the business of art, and all these other complicated topics that demand painstaking nuance. And I can’t sort through all that, because I’m too busy trying to figure out what Erika’s deal is and how full of shit she is!

Naturally, all this chaos means the film spectacularly fails to hit the landing. I’m obviously loathe to discuss the ending in any detail, but it seriously reads like the filmmakers simply ran out of time with no idea how to wrap all this up. So they threw together whatever random nonsense they could think of and called it good.

I Want Your Sex is a strange one. It’s certainly not a boring movie. It’s short and fast-paced and provocative enough to stay entertaining. The problem I keep running into here is that the characters and themes are underdeveloped because Araki won’t get out of his own damn way. Yes, the sex scenes and the mental/emotional torture are all provocative, but there’s too much shock value as an end in itself and not enough about what the shock value actually means.

The best I can say for this movie is that it’s got me interested in Araki’s other works. I’m genuinely curious to see how this movie stacks up in comparison to the greater filmography. And I will say that while The Invite was more informative, I Want Your Sex is undeniably more entertaining.


For more Movie Curiosities, check out my blog. I’m also on Facebook and BlueSky.

Movie Curiosities: Her Private Hell

Movie Curiosities: Her Private Hell

July 26, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Oh, great. This guy again.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: The Invite

Movie Curiosities: The Invite

July 22, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Back in 2019, Olivia Wilde decided to take her acting bona fides and try a pivot toward directing feature films. Her first attempt was Booksmart, and it was awesome. Her second attempt was Don’t Worry Darling, which stepped on more rakes than I could possibly catalogue here.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: The Odyssey

Movie Curiosities: The Odyssey

July 20, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

“The Odyssey” is a myth. It never happened. None of these people ever really existed. There is no evidence that the Trojan War ever happened, certainly not as depicted in Homer’s works. We have no idea who Homer was. We don’t know how anyone looked or sounded three thousand years ago. In fact, after three thousand years of genetic drift, it’s quite possible nobody back then looked or sounded like anyone now.

Two things can be true at the same time. It is absolutely true that anyone who complains about “historical accuracy” in a depiction of ancient myth is an asshole only interested in twisting ancient history and modern media to suit their own agenda. It is also true that Christopher Nolan is a jackass.

I’ve said it for years, and I still maintain that Nolan lost himself up his own ass a long time ago. One could argue that Inception was the moment when Nolan’s ego got out of control, but I still point to Tenet as the inflection point. It takes a special kind of disconnect to insist that a massive blockbuster be given a full theatrical run in a time of global plague, and be somehow shocked when it loses money. Warner Bros. gave Nolan everything he asked for in defiance of all common sense, and he still went crying to Universal. The arrogant bastard.

All this time later, Nolan continues to insist that his films are made for IMAX and must be seen on IMAX. So, if you can’t afford to pay a massive premium for an IMAX ticket, fuck you. If you don’t live anywhere near an IMAX theater, fuck you. If you ever want to see the film at home or after the opening theatrical run, fuck you.

The only reason why Nolan keeps getting away with this shit is that he’s a brilliant filmmaker who makes gorgeous movies. Nolan is a bona fide craftsman, one of the last few high-profile innovators in practical effects and camerawork. This despite the fact that his films have gotten increasingly impenetrable and pretentious. I might add that if Nolan is so insistent that his films won’t hold up as well if they’re seen on anything less than the biggest and most lavish format possible, that honestly says more about him and his cinematic output than anything else.

I might add that recently, news came in that the planned 100-day shoot was completed in 91 days. Why? By Nolan’s own account, the shoot had to shut down early because everyone in the cast and crew was too physically exhausted to continue. That does not show good planning. That does not show a healthy working environment. Yet this is supposedly one of the great modern directors. Bite me.

So, purely out of spite, I went to see The Odyssey at one of my smaller local theaters. A place that most certainly does not meet IMAX standards. And to be sure, it didn’t take away anything from the film’s scope and spectacle. There were quite a few scenes that looked like something Harryhausen would’ve made back in the day, if the VFX technology of the time was equal to his vision.

The Cyclops was less verbose than I was expecting, but the Guillermo del Toro influence was strong and welcome. The whole sequence with Circe was deeply unsettling, with nauseating prosthetic effects and an outrageously bugfuck performance by Samantha Morton. The scene with the sirens is more psychological in its delivery, which makes sense. Likewise, Odysseus doesn’t really descend into the underworld, but he does talk with the dead in a way that focuses more on emotional/spiritual turmoil than spectacle.

(Side note: Apparently, the underworld is somewhere in southern France. Who knew?)

The Fall of Troy unfolds over multiple sequences, each one more grandiose than the last. Odysseus’ climactic massacre of the suitors is laughably overwrought, but fun to watch nonetheless. The Laestrygonians were loosely adapted, but this take is an exciting central highlight.

Then we have the cast. Naturally, with so many actors, some fare better than others. I was particularly disappointed with the choice to hire Zendaya — such a fiery and dynamic screen presence — when Athena doesn’t do much of anything except sit around and look pretty. Likewise, Calypso is such a pivotal figure in the story and Charlize Theron is such an accomplished actor, it feels like Theron should’ve had the chance to contribute more than screen presence. Mia Goth is likewise wasted. Corey Hawkins is really only there to be a sounding board against Robert Pattinson, ditto Himesh Patel against Matt Damon. And Elliot Page gets killed off pretty much immediately.

By contrast, Lupita Nyong’o gets a double-role, playing twin sisters Helen and Clytemnestra. They’re both played as achingly tragic figures, brimming over with grief and guilt over what happened in the Trojan War and its preamble. Anne Hathaway plays Penelope with the same kind of unhinged despair that got her an Oscar. Tom Holland plays Telemachus with the same kind of boyish charm and unlikely heroism that made him a household name. John Leguizamo is the film’s secret weapon, playing the loyal put-upon Eumaeus in a way that brings out the best in every other actor. Jon Bernthal capably plays Menelaus as a badass in charge like only he could. Robert Pattinson plays to the cheap seats as a shitheel, and it’s fun to watch.

Agamemnon’s face is never shown onscreen. I like the notion of keeping him unseen to project that air of mystery, and it makes good use of Benny Safdie’s skills as a voice actor. But that armor was laughably overdesigned. I know he’s supposed to look all tough and imposing, but seriously, he looks like a five-year-old boy’s idea of tough and imposing.

Then we’ve got Matt Damon in the role of Odysseus himself. What’s interesting is that Damon was the worst possible choice to play Odysseus for the exact same reason that made him so ideally suited to play this interpretation of the character. Damon is not cut out to play a great war hero, but the film goes to great lengths in showing how Odysseus was unprepared for the traumatic carnage that he directly caused with the ultimate act of perfidy (also known in the modern era as “a war crime”).

As if to hammer that point home, the film repeatedly leans on “Zeus’ Law”, dictating that hospitality must be shown to all, with everyone treating everyone else as if they may be a god in disguise. This draws a direct parallel between the Trojan Horse and Penelope’s suitors, both cases in which men take advantage of and betray their host’s sense of hospitality as means to an invasion. The difference, of course, is that Odysseus eventually kills the suitors as the Trojans should’ve killed the Greeks. And Odysseus himself would likely argue that he should’ve died in Troy, which adds a whole ‘nother layer.

Moreover, Damon cannot sell himself as a tactical genius, but he is top-notch at playing a smartass. And sure enough, this take on Odysseus is absolutely a smartass. For all my prior comments about Nolan, I was astounded to find that this whole take on “The Odyssey” comes down to the topic of pride.

Odysseus decides to take an alternate route home, and he ends up getting lost. He refuses to appeal to the gods, and his men die. Time and again, Odysseus — and the other characters, to varying extents — consistently mess everything up just as quickly as they get the bright idea that they know better than everyone else. It’s outright stated in the film that Odysseus ruins everything with his own compulsive need for control, his deep-seated urge to show he knows better than everyone else, and he only finally goes home when he gives himself over and lets fate/the gods/whatever take the wheel.

The odyssey itself is portrayed as a massive undertaking. It’s something so huge, so arduous, so time-intensive and painful and fatal, it might be better for Odysseus and his soldiers to simply give up and die, or make a new home somewhere else. Back on Ithaca, Penelope is facing a similar choice, refusing to back down despite all the pressures on her to simply give up and remarry already. Given Nolan’s history with increasingly huge budgets and his compulsive need for absolute creative control, it’s not hard to see where he’s coming from.

One thing I will say about The Odyssey is that it’s nowhere near as opaque as some of Nolan’s other works. Nobody’s going to walk out of this one asking what happened or what the point was. Of course it’s self-indulgent, but any three-hour movie inevitably is.

But is it a good movie? Well, it’s a long movie and densely packed. So there’s a lot in here that’s good, a lot that’s bad, a lot to like, and a lot to hate. To put it in less wishy-washy terms, let’s compare it to another recent Odyssey adaptation: The Return.

While Nolan spent three hours scrambling to cover the full width and breadth of the Homer saga, Uberto Pasolini and his team spent two hours specifically focusing on Odysseus’ return to Ithaca and its aftermath. Thus, while Matt Damon and Anne Hathaway did a decent job of portraying their characters over the course of twenty years, Ralph Fiennes and Juliette Binoche were far more ideally suited to play the same characters at a more specific point in their lives. And sure, Nolan’s effort was much bigger on spectacle and scale, but Pasolini could really drill down deeper to develop a smaller set of characters and explore the same relevant themes to a degree that Nolan didn’t have the space for.

Sorry, but I prefer the leaner and meaner picture. Though I must give full credit to Christopher Nolan for delivering a fantastical historical epic on the scale of The Ten Commandments or Ben-Hur. You know, the kind of movies that Hollywood used to make, in between the time when Gone with the Wind took over the world and Cleopatra (1963) cost more than what was mathematically possible to recoup.

That said, I want to stress emphatically that the film is worth seeing at the time and place of your choosing. If you can’t afford the IMAX treatment, go with a standard viewing. If you want to enjoy it at home, to take a three-hour movie at your own pace, that’s totally valid. And if Nolan or anyone else looks down on you for the choice, fuck ’em.


For more Movie Curiosities, check out my blog. I’m also on Facebook and BlueSky.

Movie Curiosities: Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass

Movie Curiosities: Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass

July 13, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass comes to us from the team of David Wain and Ken Marino. Director/co-writer/producer Wain came up as a journeyman comedy director, while co-star/co-writer/producer Marino is primarily known as a prolific character actor. (I might add that they are respectively the drummer and lead vocalist of the Middle-Aged Dad Jam Band.) Given the premise, the title, and the long list of connections that Wain and Marino have racked up over their long and respectable careers, it should come as little surprise that the movie comes with a hugely stacked cast of celebrities who showed up to make fun of themselves. So let’s get to it, shall we?

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Evil Dead Burn

Movie Curiosities: Evil Dead Burn

July 11, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

In 2013, Fede Alvarez and the original franchise creators attempted an Evil Dead soft reboot. This new take offered a whole new slate of characters taking on the Deadites in a film fueled by modern sensibilities and legitimate pathos. In hindsight, the film was remarkably ahead of its time.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: The Furious

Movie Curiosities: The Furious

June 30, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Let’s get this out of the way: No, The Furious is not the tenth and final mainline entry in the Fast and Furious series. That’s still holding in development hell. What we’ve got here is a (mostly) English-language action film out of Hong Kong, notably starring Joe Taslim (the erstwhile Bi-Han himself) and Yayan Ruhian (one of Asia’s foremost action stars ever since The Raid). And the film was directed by Kenji Tanigaki, who comes with a long and respectable list of stunt coordinator credits on both sides of the Pacific.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Supergirl (2026)

Movie Curiosities: Supergirl (2026)

June 29, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

I’ve said for years that the trailer shows you the movie the studio wishes they had. Looking at the trailer for Supergirl (2026), one thing becomes immediately clear: The studio wishes that James Gunn had directed this one too.

Read the rest of this entry →