Curiosity Inc.

Movie Curiosities: Primetime

Movie Curiosities: Primetime

September 27, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Mind the CONTENT WARNING and buckle up, folks. There’s a lot to unpack with this one. Given the subject matter and the involvement of producer Ari Aster, this is gonna be a long and bumpy ride.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Resident Evil (2026)

Movie Curiosities: Resident Evil (2026)

September 24, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Constantin Film first optioned the Resident Evil video game series in 1997. And they had no idea what to do with it. Here we had a Japanese video game series adapted by a German film studio, an R-rated blood-soaked franchise that had to be tailored for a PG-13 audience. Not even George Romero could find a way to square that circle, and he cranked out half a dozen drafts in the attempt.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities — Shaun the Sheep: The Beast of Mossy Bottom

Movie Curiosities — Shaun the Sheep: The Beast of Mossy Bottom

September 21, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Everybody loves Aardman Animation. Nobody cares about their movies. Not their more recent ones, anyway.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Practical Magic 2

Movie Curiosities: Practical Magic 2

September 15, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Practical Magic was a movie far ahead of its time. It was genuinely bold to try and make a sincerely feminist movie about women rallying together to support each other in the face of toxic masculinity, all with a distinctly pagan witchcraft motif. Nowadays, it feels like such a movie would feel right on the edge where it’s relevant and familiar without being played out.

We’ve seen no shortage of similar “feminine solidarity against toxic masculinity” movies in recent memory (Is God Is only came out a few months ago), and it feels like pagan witchcraft is in vogue right now. (In my hometown of Portland, at least, I can tell you for a certainty that it is.) Hell, this was more or less the foundation of Netflix’s recent and highly successful take on “Sabrina the Teenage Witch”.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: The Dog Stars

Movie Curiosities: The Dog Stars

September 8, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Time for another fun game of “What the hell happened here?”

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Onslaught

Movie Curiosities: Onslaught

September 7, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

I remember when the news came in that Adam Wingard was directing the long-awaited big-budget Godzilla/Kong crossover from Legendary, a pivotal keystone of the “MonsterVerse” megafranchise. It felt like a sharp left turn from a filmmaker who came up making scrappy indie action/horror flicks.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: It Ends

Movie Curiosities: It Ends

August 31, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

This past year, we’ve seen a noteworthy rise in “liminal horror”. More specifically, we got hit with Exit 8 immediately before the haymaker of Backrooms. And there are several legit reasons why this subgenre has caught on.

For decades now, we’ve seen an unstoppable deluge of horror films that engage audiences and bring in box office dollars at minimal cost and quick turnaround. And by their very nature, liminal horror films are spartan enough that splurging on spectacle would defeat the point. In fact, the very point of liminal horror is the unending monotony and drudgery of modern life, in which every day is the same and there doesn’t seem to be any point in doing anything. That’s a deeply relatable anxiety in the world as it is right now.

Here’s the problem: There are only so many ways to depict dull and unending monotony on film. It’s such a uniquely specific and minimalist statement that there’s a limit to how many ways it can be made. In other words, I’m worried that this particular trend will have a pitifully short shelf life. I give it a year, maybe two, before some work of liminal horror comes along and we all shrug it off because it’s nothing we haven’t seen already.

In the meantime, here we are with It Ends, the writing/directing feature debut of Alexander Ullom. This one was made and marketed as a liminal horror film in which three hapless college grads are stuck in a car on the same endless road going straight through a dense forest without any chance to turn off.

…Oh, wait, did I say three? There are actually four characters in the car. (Plus Ullom himself in a last-second cameo right at the end.) But I only ever saw three in the trailer. Whoo boy.

We open with Tyler (Mitchell Cole), who came around to help his three freshly-graduated friends move back to their hometown. James (Phinehas Yoon) is relentlessly level-headed to the point where he comes off as a dispassionate jerk, so he’s basically the super-ego of the crew. Fisher (Noah Toth) has no brain-to-mouth filter, so panicky and impulsive that he’s often a threat to himself and others, so there’s our id. That leaves us with Day (Akira Jackson) as our ego figure to mediate between the others.

Anyway, the plot starts in earnest when our characters take a seemingly innocuous turn and somehow end up on a forest road that stretches on and on with no intersections. And the U-Haul with all their stuff somehow didn’t get caught up in the same trap, so all they’ve got is the Jeep and whatever they had on them at the time. Naturally, the bulk of the runtime is comprised of the characters experimenting and figuring out the rules. Here’s a quick rundown.

  • They’re not on a loop. It’s a straight road that inexplicably goes on and on and on for some indeterminate length, possibly forever.
  • Their cell phones have no signal, but infinite battery charge.
  • The car never runs out of gas, and it will stay drivable long after its individual parts should’ve worn out.
  • Nobody in the car will ever be tired or hungry or horny or thirsty. Bathroom breaks are no longer necessary.

Most important of all is the 90-second rule. The car can only stop for 90 seconds before strange people inexplicably come running from the woods like zombies in a Danny Boyle picture. But what’s interesting is that they only go after the car, and we never see them attack anyone outside the car.

Obviously, the threat of death by a mindless horde is sufficient motivation to keep going. Which means that if the horde wasn’t there, our characters would have no reason not to simply turn off the car, stop driving, and escape the confines of their Jeep. Moreover, while the threat of a gruesome death is horrifying, it’s also one likely way out of this purgatory. It’s really quite fascinating how the characters have that balanced kind of relationship with the monster — I don’t think I’ve seen anything like it since Life of Pi.

Otherwise… that’s pretty much the whole movie. It’s 90-some-odd minutes of the characters trying to keep themselves and each other occupied as they drive continuously and reason out whatever they can of what’s going on. We’ve got conflict between the characters who want to keep going purely out of spite and those who would rather give up than pretend this is any kind of life. We’ve got extended montages to try and compress the overwhelming volume of nothing in between scenes.

Granted, it’s certainly a well-crafted movie. I’m consistently astounded by the camerawork, editing, and production design that all make such inventive use of such a confined setting. And while the sound design is overdone, I can appreciate how it’s taking on so much heavy lifting.

But I have two major problems with this movie, and they both come back to the fundamental premise.

For one thing, there’s simply no getting around the fact that we’re stuck in a car with these characters for the entire runtime. Which means that while they’re bickering and nagging and blaming each other, we’re watching the whole thing in extreme closeup. And as long as they keep moving, we don’t even get the possibility of a jump scare or a sudden attack to shake things up. It’s not pleasant.

The other main factor is that by virtue of the “liminal horror” subgenere, we know that there will be no answers forthcoming. There’s no way to make any of this make sense. This whole thing is a metaphor for the senseless monotony of life itself, thus explaining the concept would mean explaining the meaning of life itself, which in turn would mean that life has any meaning at all, which goes entirely against the point of the genre.

This is a problem innate to the liminal horror genre: Of course the characters are going to try and figure out what’s going on, but the audience knows they can’t. So, how can the characters’ futile search for knowledge be made into something that isn’t a pointless waste of time? Backrooms got around this by dovetailing the characters’ existential dread into coping with grief and trauma. With Exit 8, the lead characters only had to understand the concept just enough to somehow win the game and escape.

With this movie, there’s basically nothing. Granted, it’s kind of fun to watch the characters’ experiments in trying to figure out the rules of this purgatory. But when they take up so much screentime trying to figure out why this is happening, what they did to deserve this, and how to get out, it’s perfectly clear that they’re talking out of their asses and wasting time with shit that will never lead to anything. Then again, it’s not like they have anything to do aside from wasting time, that’s kinda the point.

A central theme of liminal horror is that it’s not the destination, it’s the journey. Thus we know that in this picture, the end of the road is either nonexistent/never shown, or a huge disappointment. Which, again, takes a great deal of tension and interest away from any discussion about the end of the road. The best we get is the occasional discussion about how long it takes for which characters to tap out and say they’d rather sit in the forest than keep on driving.

The big problem I keep coming back to with It Ends is that the characters are perpetually at odds with the very themes and nature of the “liminal horror” genre. It’s difficult to keep the characters and their actions interesting when we the audience know that nothing they say or do matters, and the filmmakers can’t quite find a way to square that circle. And of course it’s never easy to spend 90 unbroken minutes stuck in a car with four people who can’t stop arguing with each other over petty bullshit.

What’s sad is that in many ways, the film is a victim of timing. If the film had come out last year (and it did indeed get an online release last year, in addition to multiple festival screenings), it likely would’ve been hailed as a game-changer. But then Backrooms and (to a lesser extent) Exit 8 came along to cement the liminal horror genre and It Ends only looks like an also-ran by comparison.

To be clear, it’s not necessarily a bad movie. The actors all do a solid job with what they’ve got, and I can’t give enough praise to the filmmakers for all their innovation in shooting/editing/designing a film set almost entirely in a car interior. Unfortunately — as with Exit 8 before it — the filmmakers tried to make a statement about the dull and pointless monotony of life, only to fall into their own trap and make a dull and pointless film.

I know this movie has its critical praise, and I get the appeal of the film on a surface level. But ultimately, this is a film I respect more than I like. The best I can do is a home video recommendation.


For more Movie Curiosities, check out my blog. I’m also on Facebook and BlueSky.

Movie Curiosities: Buddy

Movie Curiosities: Buddy

August 29, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

Back in the ’90s, there was a show on PBS called “Barney & Friends”. The titular Barney was a big purple dinosaur who was an imaginary friend to a rotating cast of young children. Together, they sung songs and played games and told stories in the interest of teaching kids about compassion and empathy and the power of imagination.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Coyote vs. Acme

Movie Curiosities: Coyote vs. Acme

August 23, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

I have so many mixed feelings about the Warner Bros./Paramount merger. And those mixed feelings all come down to the plain and simple truth that this is a no-win scenario.

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: The Magical Faraway Tree

Movie Curiosities: The Magical Faraway Tree

August 22, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

The Magical Faraway Tree was made and marketed on whimsy, and that’s a high-risk/high-reward maneuver. Sometimes we get The Sheep Detectives, and sometimes we get A Big Bold Beautiful Journey. And nobody should know that better than screenwriter/minor supporting actor Simon Farnaby, who previously wrote all three Paddington movies (Yay!) along with Christopher Robin (Meh.), and Wonka (Boo!).

Yeah, I was more than a bit hesitant about this one. But the summer movie season dropped off hard this year, so let’s see what we’ve got.

This is the story of the Thompsons, a humble family trying their best to carve out an honest life in London. Polly (Claire Foy) is the breadwinner, applying her skills in architecture and art toward designing new household appliances. Tim (Andrew Garfield) is the homemaker, painting and playing music while he raises the kids.

Unfortunately, Beth (Delilah Bennett-Cardy) is a self-absorbed teenager who could find a reason to be upset about literally anything, Joe (Phoenix Laroche) has a pathological addiction to his video games, and both of them talk about Wi-Fi like it’s oxygen. Their youngest (Fran, played by Billie Gadsdon) is the only remotely tolerable one, mostly because she doesn’t talk.

The plot gets going when Polly decides she would rather quit her job than be complicit in designing a fridge that records and reports sensitive data about unwitting families. (Though it’s Judi Dench voicing the fridge, so that’s nice.) The downside is that her family is now homeless and essentially penniless. Tim’s solution: Move the family back to the countryside where he grew up. They’ll renovate a nearby barn, grow enough tomatoes to make and sell Tim’s legendary tomato sauce (he has some vague Italian heritage that he may be lying or mistaken about), thus raising enough money to buy the farm outright.

I hasten to point out that Garfield’s ancestry has been extensively documented, and he has no Italian heritage whatsoever. Yet here he is, going through numerous scenes with a cartoonishly stereotyped Italian accent for the purpose of amusing his kids and insisting on some claim to Italian heritage that he can’t articulate with any consistency or detail. Even without any Italian heritage of my own, I found it deeply uncomfortable.

Back to the plot, there are a number of problems with this plan. You know, besides the obvious. For one thing, the barn is a fixer-upper that needs significant upgrades before it can even be habitable, much less a viable farm. And of course the kids would rather complain about the lack of electricity and online access, instead of doing anything constructive. Oh, and let’s not forget the tiny little detail that the family is broke, without any kind of seed money to jump-start a viable business, much less a profitable one.

Pretty much all they’ve got are Tim’s relentlessly optimistic can-do attitude, Polly’s architectural ingenuity, and whatever scraps the neighboring villagers are willing to donate. Oh, and there are also the magical neighbors living next door.

Yes, it’s common knowledge that this farmland borders a magical forest, supposedly home to various pixies and fairies and the like. After a chance encounter with the fairies, Fran is graciously invited to the eponymous Magical Faraway Tree, which is essentially a portal to the fairyland. In fact, the tree works as a kind of terminal, granting access to a number of different fantasylands (there’s a land made of candy, a land of spells, a land of birthday wishes, etc.) that rotate through on a daily basis.

Lots to unpack here.

First of all, even though the forest is widely reputed for its fairies, there are really only three worth mentioning. There’s Silky (Nicola Coughlan), the sweet and friendly fairy who takes it on herself to welcome our human characters and serve as their guide through the fairy world. There’s Moonface (Nonso Anozie), the proud and pompous humbug who insists on being the de facto leader of the fairies because he claims to be the best and smartest at literally everything despite all evidence to the contrary. And then we have Saucepan Man (Dustin Demri-Burns), Moonface’s personal footman, who insists on wearing various sizes and shapes of saucepans all over his body. He’s inexplicably made it his whole identity, even as the noise makes him comically hard of hearing.

There are maybe three or four other fairies/pixies in the supporting cast, but it’s frankly pathetic how flat they are. The booby prize goes to Mr. Whatzisname (Oliver Chris), who can’t remember his own name. That’s it. That’s his entire character. He’s strictly a one-joke character, and the joke is too boring to be properly called as such.

The characters on the magical side of things are all woefully one-dimensional — except for those rare select few with the opportunity to get a second dimension — but the actors try and compensate for that by going as over-the-top hammy as possible. It doesn’t really work. It’s only Anozie and Coughlan who can leave a memorable impression through sheer force of charm. And then there’s Rebecca Ferguson, who briefly shows up to play an over-the-top archvillain. She turns in an aggressively hammy, forcefully bug-eyed, outrageously shrill performance like nothing I’ve seen since Anne Hathaway in The Witches (2020). Though at least Ferguson doesn’t get nearly as much screen time to wear out her welcome, so there’s that.

(Side note: In the original books by Enid Blyton, Ferguson’s character was named “Dame Slap”. In more recent reprints, after corporal punishment of children fell out of fashion, the character was rewritten into “Dame Snap”. I bring it up because the filmmakers went exceedingly far out of their way to write this name change and the reason for it directly into the script. That’s a joke in this movie, I’m dead serious.)

Yet for all the lack of nuance in the fairy characters and the lack of effort in the world-building, I was pleasantly astonished by the level of effort and nuance in the themes. At first glance, you’d expect these fantasylands to be nothing but candy and rainbows and good times all around, but that’s not what happens. As events unfold, the characters learn some harsh lessons about what to wish for, whom to trust, and when to let go before taking too much of a good thing. And those lessons are all so deceptively subtle, it’s not always easy to know where the trap is until it’s too late.

I might add that quite a few scenes with the fairies are undercut by a bittersweet inevitability. As much as these fairies may like these particular kids, it’s outright stated that these are not the first human children to visit the forest. Sooner or later (and it’ll be sooner than anyone wants to think about) there will come a day when these kids stop coming. They’ll forget all about the fairies and stop believing in magic, just like everyone does when they grow up. And even in the best case scenario, it’ll be because the kids have grown strong enough that magical friends are no longer needed. In the worst case scenario, it’ll be because the kids have grown into the kind of small-minded, self-centered, materialistic bullies who actively work to make the world less magical.

Ultimately, the Tree is only really important as a metaphor. Aside from a couple of wrinkles in the third act, these kids could’ve been making up their own stories out in the forest and the plot would’ve played out more or less the same. Because first and foremost, this is a movie about the power of imagination and positive thinking. Especially with regards to children, their capacity for wonder, and the importance of holding onto that as we grow up.

Which brings us back to the “real world” side of things. Jennifer Saunders briefly appears as Polly’s disapproving mother, a woman so hopelessly dependent on her money and status that she’s literally incapable of opening a physical envelope without assistance. Of course she’s appalled at the notion of her family living out in the sticks and working on some harebrained scheme to pay the bills with tomato sauce, but there’s a strong sense that she didn’t approve of her daughter when she was living in London and making legitimate money in the first place. Note how she barely even talks of lifting a finger to help her daughter and her grandchildren, yet she’ll fly her freaking helicopter all the way out to the British countryside just to chastise them.

While this particular character doesn’t get a whole lot of screentime or impact on the plot, she capably embodies the true antagonist of the film: The system. The very same system that forced Polly to make the impossible choice of putting her and her family into destitution, or enabling the violation of consumer privacy for countless families. And because she made the honorable choice, this family is no longer capable of affording the standards that “society” demands they have.

Thus the family succeeds by getting off the grid and playing a different game. Call them fools or vagrants or whatever, but the Thompsons are playing the cards they were dealt as best they can. Or rather, some of them are. Tim is doing his best to keep everyone’s spirits high, Polly does fantastic work when she gets up to speed, and Fran loves her new fairy neighbors, but then there’s the other two.

To be perfectly honest, I found Beth to be hopelessly insufferable through the first half of the film. Here we have a kid who is unshakably resolute in making herself and everyone around her hopelessly miserable. It doesn’t matter what she has to say or do or think, she will find some way to make everything about her and her ongoing quest to prove why everything around her sucks. Even her stated goal of getting back to the city makes no sense — we clearly see for ourselves that even with her precious Wi-Fi connection and her home back in London, she’s every bit as much a disconsolate, self-centered brat.

But then comes the good news: Beth does eventually suffer for all her faults. More importantly, she learns from them and grows from them. She gets to know the fairies who — unlike her other friends — will stand up for her and with her even when there’s no electricity. She sees firsthand what her parents go through to keep generating the electricity she’s always taken for granted. She sees the disastrous consequences of getting what she thought she wanted.

All of this leads up to the moment when it’s Beth who first steps up and rallies her siblings so they can go save the day. It’s a deeply satisfying development arc to watch. By comparison, Fran pretty much completes her development arc by the end of the first act, and Joe’s development arc is pretty much the same as Beth’s with a few crucial turning points omitted.

The Magical Faraway Tree can be cloying, twee, saccharine, juvenile, and absurdly heightened in portraying the two extremes of harsh reality and whimsical enchantment. But that sweet spot in the middle, when the film shows why the two sides need each other, is where this movie fires on all cylinders. For all its flaws, the movie works as a full-throated rejection of small-minded, cynical, materialist thinking. It encourages kids and adults of all ages to play and imagine and think beyond what anyone might think is possible. Even better, the film’s messages are all delivered by way of so many clever metaphors that it all hits so much harder.

Even when the characters are thin, the plot is predictable, the jokes run on for too long, and the world-building makes no sense, the film gets by with uncompromising commitment to the tone and themes. This won’t be the best family fantasy adventure we get this year (Seriously, if this movie turns out to be better than Wildwood, I might die of disappointment.), but I’ve definitely seen worse movies in this lane. (IF, anyone?)

This certainly isn’t “must see” material, but I’m comfortable recommending it. Especially for those with young children.


For more Movie Curiosities, check out my blog. I’m also on Facebook and BlueSky.

Movie Curiosities: The Rivals of Amziah King

Movie Curiosities: The Rivals of Amziah King

August 20, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

The Rivals of Amziah King comes to us from producer/writer/director Andrew Patterson, who came up making commercials and promos for the Oklahoma City Thunder. He then went on to make The Vast of Night, which was promptly lost in the abyss of 2020. And his sophomore feature is already doomed to be one of those arthouse flicks that critics near-universally love and nobody else recognizes. So let’s see what we’ve got, shall we?

Read the rest of this entry →

Movie Curiosities: Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma

Movie Curiosities: Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma

August 19, 2026 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.

I do not like I Saw the TV Glow. I know the film has a hugely popular following, especially among the queer community, but that movie was a bridge too far for me. So naturally, when I heard that Jane Schoenbrun had come out with a new instantly popular film, I approached it with some degree of skepticism.

Read the rest of this entry →