Movie Curiosities: The Friend
April 8, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
Presently, I have no interest in reviewing A Minecraft Movie. Maybe when it hits DVD, but not right now. I’m light-years removed from the target audience, it’s nowhere near my taste in comedy, and I’m sure I have nothing of value to say about it. Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities: Death of a Unicorn
April 2, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
This one comes to us from writer/director/producer Alex Scharfman. Who’s that? No idea, this is his debut feature. But there was one familiar and instantly recognizable name that instantly turned my curiosity into dread: “Square Peg”.
That’s right, folks: Ari Aster exec-produced this. Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities: Black Bag
March 17, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
Hello, Steven. Again. Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities — The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie
March 16, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
A few years back, there was a movie called Coyote vs. Acme. It was a live-action/animated hybrid film, a legal comedy predicated on the notion that Wile E. Coyote would have grounds to sue the Acme Corporation for all their defective products. The film was written by Samy Burch (coming in hot off of May December), with story credits from Jeremy Slater and James freaking Gunn. Music video director Dave Green helmed the film, with Will Forte and John Cena starring, and Eric Bauza (the current keeper of the Mel Blanc legacy) voicing the relevant Looney Tunes characters. Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities: Novocaine
March 15, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
Once upon a time, there was a young woman named Nicola Peltz, who got it into her pretty little head that she wanted an acting career. Luckily, her father was Nelson Peltz, a billionaire investor who quickly got to work leveraging his connections in Hollywood. Sure enough, Nelson was able to secure his daughter a leading role in a huge upcoming blockbuster with Paramount. Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities: Mickey 17
March 9, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
Another pitch-black sci-fi satire from the guy who made Snowpiercer? With Robert Pattinson and Mark Ruffalo in the cast? Hell yeah, I’m in. What have we got?
The premise for Mickey 17 is centered around a new cloning technology that can 3D-print a near-perfect copy of someone — memories, personality, and all — in roughly 20 hours. Long story short, humanity realized the legal and ethical ramifications pretty much immediately, and cloning was banned worldwide. Which left a glaring loophole: Cloning is still legal in space.
Enter Kenneth Marshall (Mark Ruffalo), a failed politician who somehow maintains a zealous cult of personality even after losing his last two elections. Marshall gets the bright idea of launching an expedition to the ice planet Niflheim, where he and his lunatic disciples can escape the broken planet Earth and build their own colony. In the process, Marshall makes use of the cloning program to provide slave labor and scientific test subjects.
However, this cloning program operates under tightly controlled parameters. This means that only one person can be selected to get repeatedly cloned. Far more importantly, multiples are strictly forbidden. There can’t be two or more clones of the same person running around at the same time, or all copies are exterminated and the cloning program is scrubbed entirely.
That may sound extreme, but it makes sense in context. It’s a long story, trust me.
Anyway, the lucky expendable is Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattinson), a put-upon loser on the run from a loan shark. Out of clueless desperation, he signs up to serve as a slave laborer and scientific guinea pig on condition that he comes back as a clone each time he dies. The initial landing on Niflheim proved especially deadly, burning through many clones in the process of developing vaccines for the native viruses in the planet’s atmosphere.
Speaking of the planet’s native life, we’re quickly introduced to the creepers, these weird tardigrade-looking subterranean critters native to Niflheim. Naturally, Marshall immediately declares them to be an existential threat with no idea what he’s talking about. So it is that when the 17th clone of Mickey gets lost in a whole colony of critters, he’s written off for dead.
But no, Mickey 17 somehow survives and makes his way back to home base. Only to find that Mickey 18 (Pattinson again) had been printed after 17 was written off for dead. Yes, we have multiples. What’s worse, while Mickey 17 is kind of a spineless nitwit, Mickey 18 turns out to be a reckless sociopath. Hilarity ensues.
What we’ve got here is very much a sci-fi satire in the Terry Gilliam mold. The protagonist is a lovable idiot. The antagonist is so over-the-top obsessed with himself that the MAGA comparisons are unavoidable. The antagonist’s wife (played by Toni Collette) has this strange obsession with sauce. There’s a guy walking around in a pigeon costume for some unspecified reason. The characters are all heightened self-absorbed dolts well in keeping with the style of Brazil or Zero Theorem.
It’s a movie in which the political figures and their enablers are all small-minded brutes with no interests beyond their own, incapable of accomplishing anything that can’t be done with brute force alone. Exactly the kind of political satire we need right now. It’s an intelligent movie about rock-stupid characters, which works nicely as a commentary on authoritarianism and colonialism. In turn, these themes nicely mesh with the cloning angle to examine individuality, mortality, and the worth of a human life. I might further add that the cloning/mad science angle is just gruesome enough to get the point across without going anywhere near “body horror” territory or “The Substance” extremes.
It’s great fun watching Robert Pattinson act against himself and die repeatedly. I loved watching Ruffalo and Collette chew the scenery. Unfortunately, the plot is so terribly paced that one or two big climactic twists border on deus ex machina. Not to mention a translator that conveniently pops up so the creepers can provide some necessary exposition.
Speaking of strangely convenient plot devices, it seems like half the supporting cast has no development beyond what’s strictly necessary for the plot. Take Steven Yeung, for instance. He plays Timo, an old friend to Mickey who also boarded the colony ship to get away from the same loan shark. Except Timo is somehow able to get a job as a pilot, and not even Mickey himself can ever come up with an explanation for how that makes sense. Timo only ever shows up when Mickey is out of other options, his loyalty switches on a dime to serve the needs of the plot, and Mickey himself calls attention to how Timo is lucky to a degree that can only be described as lifelong divine intervention.
Then we’ve got Kai (Anamaria Vartolomei), a beautiful security guard held up by Marshall as a genetic paragon fit for breeding the next generation of humanity on Niflheim. Nothing is ever done with this outside of one scene. Kai is then established as a potential secondary love interest for Mickey (we’ll get to the primary one in a minute), and nothing is done with this. It’s like Kai is introduced, then the filmmakers visibly grasp for anything they can possibly do with her, until the filmmakers throw up their hands and sideline her until a quick acknowledgment in the denouement.
But then there’s Nasha Barridge, another security agent, played by Naomi Ackie. Nasha is the primary love interest, someone who pretty much immediately fell in love with Mickey and proves to be the most steadfast ally to both Mickey 17 and Mickey 18 all throughout the runtime. On the upside, Ackie is more than charismatic to hold her own and she plays Nasha as a bona fide powerhouse. I must also give due props to a female lead who takes proactive and impactful measures in the third act independent of the male lead.
On the downside, I’m at a loss for why such a gorgeous uber-competent hardass would fall instantly and ardently in love with poor pathetic Mickey. (Again, Mickey himself explicitly points out that this makes no sense.) Moreover, if Nasha is faithfully partnered with each and every iteration of Mickey, and if each iteration of Mickey is markedly different (as clearly evidenced by 17 and 18), that raises a whole bunch of fascinating questions that the movie never bothers to ask.
Ultimately, Mickey 17 is a film that lives and dies on its own bizarre terms. For all of my complaints about the supporting cast and the plot, most of those drawbacks fail to register because of the snooker-loopy tone and the heightened characters. Incidentally, both also serve to make the film comical and fun to sit through without distracting from the headier concepts and satire.
It’s enjoyable to sit through, and pickings are slim in the multiplexes right now. I’d suggest giving it a shot.
For more Movie Curiosities, check out my blog. I’m also on Facebook and BlueSky.
Movie Curiosities: The Monkey
March 2, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
I’ve said for years that James Wan without Leigh Whannell is massively overrated. (Though Whannell on his own looks a lot less impressive since The Wolf Man a couple months back.) And I’ve been saying ever since the film came out that Longlegs is fool’s gold. So I feel quite a bit validated to see The Monkey — a film heavily promoted on the names of producer Wan and Longlegs writer/director Osgood Perkins — come out in the February dead zone between a Marvel premiere and the Oscars. And the box office returns have been appropriately underwhelming, though the budget was low enough that the film has assuredly made back its money already.
Then again, it’s a film about a haunted toy monkey that causes random and spontaneous deaths. It’s miracle enough that such a film didn’t go straight to DVD, never mind that it got greenlit at all. And yes, of course the film is based on a Stephen King story — the man has told so many stories that have been adapted into so many films of such wildly varying quality, that tells us nothing.
So what exactly have we got here? Well, it’s a horror/comedy that leans hard and heavy into how stupid the premise is. That’s a huge part of why it works so well.
This is the story of twin brothers Hal and Bill Shelburn, played as adults by Theo James and as children by Christian Convery. Hal is the protagonist, while Bill is the estranged brother who’s a relentless two-dimensional bully (it’s a Stephen King story, you know the type). Long story short, their father (played by Adam Scott) is an airline pilot who picked up the eponymous monkey in his travels. He tried destroying the toy, but it somehow managed to return like nothing happened. (It does that a lot.) At some later point, the father disappears to places unknown — it’s not entirely clear why, but one imagines the haunted monkey had something to do with it.
Anyway, the boys grow up under the care of their struggling single mother (played by Tatiana Maslany with her typically wry sense of humor). The boys discover the monkey, they get to playing around with it, Hal gets the bright idea of trying to use it to get back at everyone bullying him, and that goes about as well as you’d expect. So the brothers drop the monkey down a well and eventually drift apart.
Cut to 25 years later, when the monkey resurfaces and the bodies start piling up. It’s not entirely clear as to why now, but the brutally random and unpredictable nature of the monkey is the entire point (we’ll come back to that). The bottom line here is that Hal has to try and stop the monkey before any more innocent people get hurt. Most especially Hal’s estranged son (Petey, played by Colin O’Brien), who was of course brought up knowing nothing about the monkey, asshole Uncle Bill, or anything else about his bloody family history.
What’s important to know about this movie is that everything is heightened. With the exceptions of Hal and Petey, both of whom act as the “straight men”, every last character is an obnoxious heel and the actors are all hamming it up for the cheap seats. Yes, that includes Theo James in the Bill role.
Perhaps more importantly, the kills in this movie are outrageously over-the-top. We’ve got kills that freaking Mortal Kombat would reject as too juvenile and implausible. We’ve got people spontaneously exploding into red mist with a frequency and sinister hilarity like nothing I’ve seen outside a Radio Silence picture. And yet it works.
For one thing, the cartoonish kills hammer home the point that something supernatural is at work here and there’s no way any of these fatalities could be mere accidents. For another thing, the absurd kills fit the tone of the absurd characters, and it all blends together into a pitch-black horror/comedy. I might further add that a great many Stephen King characters are recurring paper-thin archetypes, and leaning into that in the process of making a demented horror/comedy was an ingenious tactic.
Moreover, this is very much a film about the inevitability of death and the capricious nature of bad luck, both of which are personified by the monkey. Somehow, the senseless nature of the characters dovetails with the senseless nature of bad luck, and it all works elegantly. It’s regrettably easy for a film about chaos to itself turn out incomprehensibly chaotic, and I applaud the filmmakers for edging right up to that line without ever quite crossing it completely. It certainly helps that Hal and Petey are just grounded enough that they can sell the themes of grief and generational trauma.
In retrospect, considering that Perkins’ father died of AIDS in the early ’90s (at the height of AIDS panic, remember) and his mother was killed in the 9/11 attacks, it’s really little wonder he was so remarkably capable of delivering this movie about how death is so unpredictable and yet so inevitable. Given that history, approaching the subject with such a sense of humor is commendable. And balancing that humor with heart makes for a solid film.
The Monkey turned out to be a delightful surprise. I wasn’t expecting it to be so merciless or funny, but that pitch-black sense of humor sets it apart from other modern low-budget horror films in this lane. I was not expecting to like this movie more than I liked Longlegs, but it certainly helps that The Monkey was clearer in its intent and doesn’t take itself so seriously.
We could always use a good horror/comedy, and this one blows Heart Eyes into a fine red mist. I’m happy to recommend it.
For more Movie Curiosities, check out my blog. I’m also on Facebook and BlueSky.
Movie Curiosities — Captain America: Brave New World
February 19, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
I’d like for you to consider a question, and there’s no right answer (not yet, anyway): What do we want from Marvel? Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities: Paddington in Peru
February 18, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
We as a civilization do not deserve the Paddington movies. Read the rest of this entry →
Movie Curiosities: Dog Man
February 17, 2025 in Blogs, Curiosity Inc.
Dog Man opens with an animated short about the Bad Guys, a quick little vignette to touch base with the anthropomorphic animal antiheroes. I’m glad that movie’s getting a sequel later this year. The first movie turned out to be a pleasant surprise and I’m interested to see where they go with a sequel. Read the rest of this entry →
